{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "generatedAt": "2026-07-15T11:27:17.421Z",
  "release": {
    "date": "2026-07-15",
    "title": "首发底库：40 个案件完成来源与程序标识校验",
    "dek": "覆盖训练版权、AI 发明人、算法歧视、生物识别、算法定价、产品责任与职业责任等议题。",
    "matterIds": [
      "matter-01",
      "matter-04",
      "matter-10",
      "matter-13",
      "matter-26"
    ],
    "eventIds": [
      "matter-01:event-1",
      "matter-04:event-1",
      "matter-10:event-1",
      "matter-13:event-1",
      "matter-26:event-1"
    ],
    "releaseId": "release-2026-07-15-seed"
  },
  "counts": {
    "matters": 40,
    "active": 13,
    "topics": 12
  },
  "matters": [
    {
      "id": "matter-01",
      "slug": "andersen-v-stability-ai",
      "titleZh": "安徒生等诉 Stability AI 等案",
      "formalName": "Andersen et al. v. Stability AI Ltd. et al.",
      "summary": "多名视觉艺术家指控图像生成服务在未经许可的情况下使用作品训练模型，并产生与艺术家风格或作品相关的输出。案件仍在美国加州北区联邦法院推进。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/andersen-v-stability-ai"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-02",
      "slug": "new-york-times-v-microsoft-openai",
      "titleZh": "《纽约时报》诉微软与 OpenAI 案",
      "formalName": "The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al.",
      "summary": "《纽约时报》主张其新闻作品被用于训练大模型，并称相关产品可生成与文章相同或高度相似的内容。被告否认侵权，案件持续审理。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·纽约南区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/new-york-times-v-microsoft-openai"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-03",
      "slug": "tremblay-v-openai",
      "titleZh": "特伦布莱等诉 OpenAI 案",
      "formalName": "Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc.",
      "summary": "作家保罗·特伦布莱等人针对 OpenAI 训练和输出提出著作权请求。该早期案件后来进入合并诉讼轨道，原案卷已终结。",
      "status": "closed",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/tremblay-v-openai"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-04",
      "slug": "kadrey-v-meta",
      "titleZh": "卡德里等诉 Meta 案",
      "formalName": "Kadrey et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.",
      "summary": "作家指控 Meta 使用含有其作品的数据训练 Llama。地区法院在 2025 年就当时记录向 Meta 作出部分简易判决，但强调训练合理使用高度依赖具体市场证据。案件仍有其他请求和程序在推进。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/kadrey-v-meta"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-05",
      "slug": "bartz-v-anthropic",
      "titleZh": "巴茨等诉 Anthropic 案",
      "formalName": "Bartz et al. v. Anthropic PBC",
      "summary": "作家就 Anthropic 获取书籍、建立中央资料库并训练 Claude 提起集体诉讼。法院区分了模型训练用途与获取盗版副本的行为；双方和解已获初步批准，但截至 2026 年 7 月仍待最终批准命令。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/bartz-v-anthropic"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-06",
      "slug": "thomson-reuters-v-ross-intelligence",
      "titleZh": "汤森路透诉 ROSS Intelligence 案",
      "formalName": "Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et al. v. ROSS Intelligence Inc.",
      "summary": "汤森路透主张 ROSS 为训练法律检索系统使用了由 Westlaw 内容制作的问答材料。地区法院在 2025 年就部分作品判定侵权并否定合理使用抗辩。",
      "status": "on-appeal",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·特拉华区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/thomson-reuters-v-ross-intelligence"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-07",
      "slug": "doe-v-github-copilot",
      "titleZh": "Doe 诉 GitHub Copilot 案",
      "formalName": "Doe 1 et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al.",
      "summary": "匿名开发者就 GitHub Copilot 使用开源代码训练及输出代码提起诉讼。法院对 DMCA 著作权管理信息等请求作出多轮驳回，部分问题进入上诉程序。",
      "status": "on-appeal",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/doe-v-github-copilot"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-08",
      "slug": "concord-v-anthropic",
      "titleZh": "康科德等音乐出版商诉 Anthropic 案",
      "formalName": "Concord Music Group, Inc. et al. v. Anthropic PBC",
      "summary": "多家音乐出版商指控 Claude 训练和输出受版权保护的歌词。案件围绕歌词复制、输出防护和服务提供者责任继续推进。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·田纳西中区/加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/concord-v-anthropic"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-09",
      "slug": "getty-images-v-stability-ai-us",
      "titleZh": "Getty Images 诉 Stability AI（美国）",
      "formalName": "Getty Images (US), Inc. v. Stability AI, Inc.",
      "summary": "Getty Images 指控 Stability AI 未经许可复制数百万张图片及相关元数据训练 Stable Diffusion，并提出与 Getty 水印输出有关的商标请求。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·特拉华区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/getty-images-v-stability-ai-us"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-10",
      "slug": "getty-images-v-stability-ai-uk",
      "titleZh": "Getty Images 诉 Stability AI（英国）",
      "formalName": "Getty Images (US) Inc. and others v. Stability AI Ltd.",
      "summary": "英国高等法院在 Getty 缩减训练版权请求后，驳回剩余的次要版权侵权主张，仅在非常有限的输出情形认定商标侵权。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "trademark",
      "jurisdiction": "英国·英格兰和威尔士高等法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/getty-images-v-stability-ai-uk"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-11",
      "slug": "ftc-v-donotpay",
      "titleZh": "FTC 对 DoNotPay“机器人律师”执法",
      "formalName": "In the Matter of DoNotPay, Inc.",
      "summary": "美国联邦贸易委员会指控 DoNotPay 对其“机器人律师”能力作出缺乏依据的宣传，并于 2025 年通过最终命令解决案件。",
      "status": "under-order",
      "primaryTopic": "consumer-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦贸易委员会",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/ftc-v-donotpay"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-12",
      "slug": "ftc-v-evolv-technologies",
      "titleZh": "FTC 诉 Evolv AI 安检宣传案",
      "formalName": "Federal Trade Commission v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.",
      "summary": "FTC 指控 Evolv 对 AI 安检系统的检测能力、准确性和效率作出误导性宣传；双方提交约定禁令解决争议。",
      "status": "under-order",
      "primaryTopic": "consumer-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·马萨诸塞区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/ftc-v-evolv-technologies"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-13",
      "slug": "united-states-v-realpage",
      "titleZh": "美国诉 RealPage 算法定价案",
      "formalName": "United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.",
      "summary": "美国司法部与多州指控 RealPage 利用房东共享的非公开信息生成租金建议，构成限制竞争和垄断行为。2025 年双方提交拟议同意判决。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "competition",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·北卡罗来纳中区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/united-states-v-realpage"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-14",
      "slug": "thaler-v-perlmutter",
      "titleZh": "Thaler 诉 Perlmutter AI 作者身份案",
      "formalName": "Thaler v. Perlmutter",
      "summary": "Stephen Thaler 试图为其称由 AI 自主生成的图像登记版权。联邦上诉法院维持版权局拒绝登记，确认现行法要求人类作者；美国最高法院于 2026 年拒绝受理复审。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·哥伦比亚特区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/thaler-v-perlmutter"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-15",
      "slug": "zarya-of-the-dawn-registration",
      "titleZh": "《黎明的扎里娅》版权登记复核",
      "formalName": "Zarya of the Dawn — Copyright Registration VAu001480196",
      "summary": "美国版权局重新审查一部含 Midjourney 图像的漫画，保留对人类创作文字和编排的保护，但排除 AI 生成图像本身。",
      "status": "closed",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·版权局",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/zarya-of-the-dawn-registration"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-16",
      "slug": "sec-ai-washing-delphia-global-predictions",
      "titleZh": "SEC 首批“AI 洗白”执法：Delphia 与 Global Predictions",
      "formalName": "In the Matter of Delphia (USA) Inc.; In the Matter of Global Predictions, Inc.",
      "summary": "SEC 指控两家投资顾问对其使用 AI 的方式作出虚假或误导性陈述。两家公司在不承认也不否认调查结果的情况下和解并支付罚款。",
      "status": "under-order",
      "primaryTopic": "consumer-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·证券交易委员会",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/sec-ai-washing-delphia-global-predictions"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-17",
      "slug": "thaler-v-vidal",
      "titleZh": "Thaler 诉 Vidal：AI 发明人案",
      "formalName": "Thaler v. Vidal",
      "summary": "美国联邦巡回上诉法院确认《专利法》中的发明人必须是自然人，因此不能把 DABUS 机器列为唯一发明人。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "patent",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦巡回上诉法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/thaler-v-vidal"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-18",
      "slug": "thaler-v-comptroller-dabus-uk",
      "titleZh": "DABUS 英国最高法院发明人案",
      "formalName": "Thaler v. Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks",
      "summary": "英国最高法院一致裁定，DABUS 不是《1977 年专利法》意义上的发明人，机器所有权本身也不能产生申请专利的权利。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "patent",
      "jurisdiction": "英国·最高法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/thaler-v-comptroller-dabus-uk"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-19",
      "slug": "ewert-v-canada",
      "titleZh": "Ewert 诉加拿大惩教署算法评估案",
      "formalName": "Ewert v. Canada (Correctional Service)",
      "summary": "加拿大最高法院认定，惩教机构未采取合理步骤验证风险评估工具对原住民服刑人员是否有效，违反法定义务。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "automated-decision-making",
      "jurisdiction": "加拿大·最高法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/ewert-v-canada"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-20",
      "slug": "epo-dabus-j8-20-j9-20",
      "titleZh": "欧洲专利局 DABUS 发明人上诉",
      "formalName": "Designation of inventor/DABUS, J 8/20 and J 9/20",
      "summary": "欧洲专利局法律上诉委员会驳回两项将 DABUS 列为发明人的申请上诉，要求指定具有法律人格的自然人。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "patent",
      "jurisdiction": "欧洲专利局·法律上诉委员会",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/epo-dabus-j8-20-j9-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-21",
      "slug": "li-v-liu-ai-image",
      "titleZh": "李某诉刘某 AI 文生图著作权案",
      "formalName": "Li v. Liu — AI-generated image copyright case",
      "summary": "北京互联网法院认定，用户通过提示词选择、调整和反复生成形成的案涉图片体现了自然人的独创性智力投入，可构成作品；被告转载构成侵权。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "中国·北京互联网法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/li-v-liu-ai-image"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-22",
      "slug": "tencent-v-yingxun-dreamwriter",
      "titleZh": "腾讯 Dreamwriter 自动写作著作权案",
      "formalName": "Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd.",
      "summary": "深圳市南山区法院认定，一篇由 Dreamwriter 辅助生成、体现团队安排与选择的财经报道构成法人作品，未经许可转载构成侵权。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "copyright",
      "jurisdiction": "中国·深圳市南山区人民法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/tencent-v-yingxun-dreamwriter"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-23",
      "slug": "young-v-neocortext",
      "titleZh": "Young 诉 NeoCortext 换脸应用案",
      "formalName": "Kyland Young v. NeoCortext, Inc.",
      "summary": "真人秀参演者 Kyland Young 指控换脸应用 Reface 在带水印的示例中使用其肖像为付费订阅引流。第九巡回法院维持拒绝适用反 SLAPP 删除请求的裁定。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "personality-deepfake",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·第九巡回上诉法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/young-v-neocortext"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-24",
      "slug": "lehrman-v-lovo",
      "titleZh": "Lehrman 等诉 Lovo AI 声音克隆案",
      "formalName": "Lehrman et al. v. Lovo, Inc.",
      "summary": "两名配音演员指控 Lovo 以受限用途取得录音后复制其声音并用于商业 AI 语音产品。法院在 2025 年驳回部分请求，但保留若干商标、合同和人格利益相关主张。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "personality-deepfake",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·纽约南区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/lehrman-v-lovo"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-25",
      "slug": "state-v-loomis",
      "titleZh": "威斯康星州诉 Loomis 风险评分案",
      "formalName": "State v. Loomis",
      "summary": "被告挑战量刑时使用专有 COMPAS 风险评估。威斯康星州最高法院允许有限使用，但要求附带警示，且不得把评分作为决定监禁与否或刑期长短的决定性因素。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "automated-decision-making",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·威斯康星州最高法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/state-v-loomis"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-26",
      "slug": "garcia-v-character-technologies",
      "titleZh": "Garcia 诉 Character.AI 产品责任案",
      "formalName": "Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc. et al.",
      "summary": "一名未成年用户的母亲起诉 Character.AI、创始人及 Google，主张聊天机器人设计和互动导致严重心理伤害并与其死亡有关。被告否认责任，案件仍在审理。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "product-liability",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·佛罗里达中区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/garcia-v-character-technologies"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-27",
      "slug": "ftc-v-rite-aid-facial-recognition",
      "titleZh": "FTC 诉 Rite Aid 人脸识别案",
      "formalName": "Federal Trade Commission v. Rite Aid Corporation et al.",
      "summary": "FTC 指控 Rite Aid 在门店部署人脸识别时缺乏合理保障，产生大量误报并对消费者造成伤害。约定命令禁止其五年内使用人脸识别安防系统。",
      "status": "under-order",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·宾夕法尼亚东区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/ftc-v-rite-aid-facial-recognition"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-28",
      "slug": "ftc-everalbum",
      "titleZh": "FTC 对 Everalbum 人脸识别执法",
      "formalName": "In the Matter of Everalbum, Inc.",
      "summary": "FTC 指控照片应用 Everalbum 对人脸识别启用方式和停用账户数据保留作出误导。最终命令要求删除相关数据及由其训练的模型或算法。",
      "status": "closed",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦贸易委员会",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/ftc-everalbum"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-29",
      "slug": "cnil-clearview-ai",
      "titleZh": "法国 CNIL 对 Clearview AI 处罚",
      "formalName": "CNIL Restricted Committee Decision SAN-2022-019 concerning Clearview AI",
      "summary": "法国数据保护机构认定 Clearview 大规模抓取法国境内人员图像并建立生物识别数据库缺乏法律依据，处以 2,000 万欧元罚款并要求停止处理和删除数据。",
      "status": "under-order",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "法国·CNIL",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/cnil-clearview-ai"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-30",
      "slug": "aclu-v-clearview-ai",
      "titleZh": "ACLU 诉 Clearview AI 生物识别案",
      "formalName": "American Civil Liberties Union et al. v. Clearview AI, Inc.",
      "summary": "ACLU 等组织依据伊利诺伊州 BIPA 起诉 Clearview。2022 年同意令限制 Clearview 向多数美国私营实体提供人脸数据库，并在伊利诺伊州设置更严格限制。",
      "status": "settled",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·伊利诺伊州库克县巡回法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/aclu-v-clearview-ai"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-31",
      "slug": "in-re-clearview-ai-consumer-privacy",
      "titleZh": "Clearview AI 消费者隐私合并诉讼",
      "formalName": "In re Clearview AI, Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation",
      "summary": "多起针对 Clearview 抓取网络照片并生成面部模板的消费者诉讼被集中审理。地区法院曾批准以 Clearview 未来价值相关权益为核心的和解，但第七巡回法院于 2026 年撤销批准并发回重审。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·第七巡回/伊利诺伊北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/in-re-clearview-ai-consumer-privacy"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-32",
      "slug": "patel-v-facebook",
      "titleZh": "Patel 诉 Facebook 面部模板案",
      "formalName": "Patel et al. v. Facebook, Inc.",
      "summary": "Facebook 用户主张“Tag Suggestions”在未取得 BIPA 所需同意时扫描面部几何。第九巡回法院确认原告具有联邦诉讼资格，案件后以 6.5 亿美元和解。",
      "status": "settled",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·第九巡回上诉法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/patel-v-facebook"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-33",
      "slug": "cothron-v-white-castle",
      "titleZh": "Cothron 诉 White Castle 指纹扫描案",
      "formalName": "Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc.",
      "summary": "伊利诺伊州最高法院以 4 比 3 裁定，在未取得法定同意时，每一次收集或传输生物识别信息都可分别产生 BIPA 请求。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "privacy-data-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·伊利诺伊州最高法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/cothron-v-white-castle"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-34",
      "slug": "bridges-v-south-wales-police",
      "titleZh": "Bridges 诉南威尔士警方实时人脸识别案",
      "formalName": "R (Bridges) v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police",
      "summary": "英格兰和威尔士上诉法院认定南威尔士警方两次部署实时人脸识别的法律框架过于宽泛，并在数据保护影响评估和公共部门平等义务上存在缺陷。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "public-law-human-rights",
      "jurisdiction": "英国·英格兰和威尔士上诉法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/bridges-v-south-wales-police"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-35",
      "slug": "glukhin-v-russia",
      "titleZh": "Glukhin 诉俄罗斯人脸识别监控案",
      "formalName": "Glukhin v. Russia",
      "summary": "欧洲人权法院认定，俄罗斯利用人脸识别识别、定位并逮捕一名和平示威者，不符合必要性要求，侵犯其隐私和表达自由。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "public-law-human-rights",
      "jurisdiction": "欧洲人权法院",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/glukhin-v-russia"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-36",
      "slug": "mobley-v-workday",
      "titleZh": "Mobley 诉 Workday AI 招聘歧视案",
      "formalName": "Mobley v. Workday, Inc.",
      "summary": "求职者指控 Workday 的算法筛选工具基于种族、年龄和残障产生歧视。法院认定在特定指控下 Workday 可作为雇主的代理承担联邦反歧视法责任，案件继续推进。",
      "status": "active",
      "primaryTopic": "discrimination",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/mobley-v-workday"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-37",
      "slug": "eeoc-v-itutorgroup",
      "titleZh": "EEOC 诉 iTutorGroup 自动拒聘案",
      "formalName": "EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc. et al.",
      "summary": "EEOC 指控 iTutorGroup 的在线申请软件自动拒绝达到特定年龄的女性和男性求职者。双方以 36.5 万美元及禁令性救济和解。",
      "status": "settled",
      "primaryTopic": "discrimination",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·纽约东区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/eeoc-v-itutorgroup"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-38",
      "slug": "louis-v-saferent",
      "titleZh": "Louis 等诉 SafeRent 租客评分案",
      "formalName": "Louis et al. v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC et al.",
      "summary": "黑人和拉丁裔住房券申请人主张 SafeRent 租客评分造成不利影响。法院拒绝驳回主要公平住房法请求，案件后来以集体和解结束。",
      "status": "settled",
      "primaryTopic": "discrimination",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·马萨诸塞区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/louis-v-saferent"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-39",
      "slug": "mata-v-avianca",
      "titleZh": "Mata 诉 Avianca 虚假 AI 引证制裁案",
      "formalName": "Mata v. Avianca, Inc.",
      "summary": "律师向法院提交由 ChatGPT 生成的不存在判例，并在质疑后继续提供虚假裁判文本。法院依据 Rule 11 及固有权力对律师和律所实施制裁。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "professional-responsibility",
      "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·纽约南区",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/mata-v-avianca"
    },
    {
      "id": "matter-40",
      "slug": "moffatt-v-air-canada",
      "titleZh": "Moffatt 诉加拿大航空聊天机器人案",
      "formalName": "Moffatt v. Air Canada",
      "summary": "加拿大航空网站聊天机器人向乘客提供错误的丧亲票价信息。卑诗省民事解决审裁处认定航空公司应对网站信息负责并赔偿差额。",
      "status": "decided",
      "primaryTopic": "consumer-protection",
      "jurisdiction": "加拿大·不列颠哥伦比亚省民事解决审裁处",
      "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-15",
      "url": "/cases/moffatt-v-air-canada"
    }
  ]
}