{ "schemaVersion": "2.0", "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T13:44:57.251Z", "compatibility": { "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true, "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true }, "matter": { "id": "matter-15", "slug": "zarya-of-the-dawn-registration", "titleZh": "《黎明的扎里娅》版权登记复核", "formalName": "Zarya of the Dawn — Copyright Registration VAu001480196", "aliases": [ "Zarya of the Dawn", "Kashtanova registration" ], "summary": "美国版权局重新审查一部含 Midjourney 图像的漫画，保留对人类创作文字和编排的保护，但排除 AI 生成图像本身。", "professionalSummary": "版权局取消原证书并重发范围更窄的登记；决定区分文字、选择协调编排与 Midjourney 生成图像，且明确只依据该行政记录。", "whyItMatters": "它提供了混合型人机作品如何披露并限定登记范围的首批操作标准。", "status": "closed", "primaryTopic": "copyright", "secondaryTopics": [], "aiRoles": [ "model-output" ], "jurisdiction": "美国·版权局", "industries": [ "漫画", "版权登记" ], "significance": { "legalNovelty": 27, "impactScope": 20, "institutionalLevel": 17, "crossBorder": 6, "sustainedCoverage": 13, "total": 83 }, "highProfile": true, "featured": false, "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-15", "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16", "proceedings": [ { "id": "matter-15:proceeding-1", "matterId": "matter-15", "formalName": "Zarya of the Dawn — Copyright Registration VAu001480196", "identifier": "VAu001480196", "identifiers": { "registrationNumber": "VAu001480196" }, "forum": "U.S. Copyright Office", "jurisdiction": "美国·版权局", "type": "registration-review", "stage": "final-order", "status": "closed", "startedAt": "2023-02-21", "precedentialWeight": "not-applicable", "officialUrl": "https://www.copyright.gov/docs/zarya-of-the-dawn.pdf" } ], "events": [ { "id": "matter-15:event-1", "matterId": "matter-15", "proceedingId": "matter-15:proceeding-1", "date": "2023-02-21", "type": "regulatory-action", "title": "版权局重发限定范围的登记证书", "summary": "版权局保留对人类创作文字及选择、协调和编排的登记，但排除 Midjourney 生成图像。", "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1", "matter-15:claim-procedure", "matter-15:claim-event" ] } ], "documents": [ { "id": "matter-15:document-1", "familyId": "matter-15:family-1", "matterId": "matter-15", "eventId": "matter-15:event-1", "title": "Copyright registration decision: Zarya of the Dawn", "originalTitle": "Copyright registration decision: Zarya of the Dawn", "url": "https://www.copyright.gov/docs/zarya-of-the-dawn.pdf", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "us-copyright-office", "publishedAt": "2023-02-21", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "registrationNumber": "VAu001480196" }, "language": "en" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "matter-15:claim-1", "matterId": "matter-15", "eventId": "matter-15:event-1", "text": "版权局保留对人类创作文字及选择、协调和编排的登记，但排除 Midjourney 生成图像。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-02-21" }, { "id": "matter-15:claim-procedure", "matterId": "matter-15", "eventId": "matter-15:event-1", "text": "VAu001480196 是本站记录的正式程序编号，程序由 U.S. Copyright Office 处理。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-02-21" }, { "id": "matter-15:claim-event", "matterId": "matter-15", "eventId": "matter-15:event-1", "text": "2023-02-21，案卷记录“版权局重发限定范围的登记证书”这一程序节点；该日期与事件由所引直接材料支持。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-02-21" } ], "caseBackground": { "narrativeZh": "美国版权局重新审查 Kashtanova 登记的漫画《Zarya of the Dawn》。作品包含人类创作文字、页面选择协调编排以及 Midjourney 生成图像；版权局取消原证书并重发范围更窄的登记，只保留可归于人类的部分。", "partiesZh": [ "登记申请人 Kristina Kashtanova", "美国版权局" ], "aiSystemZh": "Midjourney", "challengedConductZh": "原登记未把 Midjourney 生成图像与人类创作文字、选择协调编排清楚区分。", "allegedHarmZh": "争议不是侵权损害，而是混合型漫画的哪些表达符合登记条件以及申请应如何披露。", "proceduralOriginZh": "版权局以登记号 VAu001480196 重新审查，并于 2023 年 2 月 21 日作出取消原证书、重发限定登记的决定。", "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1", "matter-15:claim-procedure", "matter-15:claim-event" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ] }, "issues": [ { "id": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "matterId": "matter-15", "titleZh": "Midjourney 图像本身的作者身份", "questionZh": "申请人在本案记录中的提示和生成过程，是否使 Midjourney 图像本身成为人类创作？", "contextZh": "版权局按本次申请和生成记录判断，不把使用提示工具本身等同于对最终图像表达的作者控制。", "topic": "copyright", "status": "resolved", "courtTreatmentZh": "版权局将 Midjourney 生成图像排除在登记范围之外。", "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images:position-1", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "sideZh": "申请人", "positionZh": "申请整部含 AI 图像漫画的版权登记。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images:position-2", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "sideZh": "版权局", "positionZh": "认定案内 Midjourney 图像没有显示足以归于人类作者的表达控制。", "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ] } ] }, { "id": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "matterId": "matter-15", "titleZh": "文字与页面编排的保护", "questionZh": "即使单幅 AI 图像不受保护，人类创作文字及对页面的选择、协调和编排能否独立登记？", "contextZh": "混合型作品可以把不可登记材料作为组成部分，同时保护人类创作的文字和整体编排。", "topic": "copyright", "status": "resolved", "courtTreatmentZh": "版权局保留对人类创作文字以及选择、协调和编排的登记。", "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement:position-1", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "sideZh": "申请人", "positionZh": "对漫画整体提交登记并主张其中的人类创作贡献。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement:position-2", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "sideZh": "版权局", "positionZh": "接受文字和页面编排的保护，但把保护范围限定为这些人类贡献。", "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ] } ] }, { "id": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure", "matterId": "matter-15", "titleZh": "混合型作品的登记披露", "questionZh": "申请含 AI 生成材料的作品时，应如何识别并排除不受保护部分？", "contextZh": "原证书被取消和重发说明登记范围必须与实际人类创作贡献一致。", "topic": "copyright", "status": "open", "claimIds": [], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure:position-1", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure", "sideZh": "申请人", "positionZh": "接受对作品生成过程进行重新审查。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure:position-2", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure", "sideZh": "版权局", "positionZh": "要求登记仅覆盖可识别的人类创作部分，并排除 AI 生成图像。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] } ], "decisions": [ { "id": "matter-15:decision-1", "matterId": "matter-15", "proceedingId": "matter-15:proceeding-1", "eventId": "matter-15:event-1", "date": "2023-02-21", "outcomeZh": "版权局取消原登记证书并重发限定证书，保护人类创作文字及选择、协调和编排，排除 Midjourney 图像。", "holdingsZh": [ "案内 Midjourney 生成图像不属于可登记的人类作者表达。", "漫画文字以及人类对图文页面的选择、协调和编排可以获得保护。" ], "reasoningZh": [ "版权局逐项识别申请人对最终作品表达的控制，把提示生成图像与人类撰写和编排活动区分。", "混合型作品登记可以保留人类创作部分，同时明确排除不可登记材料。" ], "reliefZh": "取消范围过宽的原证书并重发范围更窄的登记证书；没有为 Midjourney 图像本身提供版权登记。", "scopeAndLimitsZh": "决定只依据《Zarya of the Dawn》的具体行政记录，不为所有提示词或 AI 辅助图像设定统一结果。", "precedentialWeight": "not-applicable", "appealStatusZh": "Matter 标记为已关闭，现有案卷未列对重发登记决定的司法复审或撤销程序。", "documentIds": [ "matter-15:document-1" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-15:claim-1" ] } ], "issueDocumentLinks": [ { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 4 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" } ] }, "issueDocuments": [ { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 4 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "familyId": "knowledge-family-authors-and-machines", "title": "作者与机器", "originalTitle": "Authors and Machines", "url": "https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SF2MC24", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "berkeley-technology-law-journal", "publishedAt": "2019", "author": "Jane C. Ginsburg; Luke Ali Budiardjo", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "以作品构思和执行为两项支柱分析机器辅助创作，主张关键问题不是机器能否成为作者，而是设计者或使用者的人类贡献是否足以构成作者身份。", "venue": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal 34(2): 343–448", "publisher": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "model-output", "agentic-action" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "familyId": "knowledge-family-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "title": "生成式 AI 遇上版权法", "originalTitle": "Generative AI Meets Copyright", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "science", "publishedAt": "2023-07-14", "author": "Pamela Samuelson", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "概述生成式 AI 训练与输出引发的版权诉讼路径，强调合理使用是逐案判断，正在进行的案件会同时影响开发者、部署者和普通使用者。", "venue": "Science 381(6654): 158–161", "publisher": "American Association for the Advancement of Science", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": true }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-15-matter-15:issue-midjourney-images-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-midjourney-images", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "familyId": "knowledge-family-authors-and-machines", "title": "作者与机器", "originalTitle": "Authors and Machines", "url": "https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SF2MC24", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "berkeley-technology-law-journal", "publishedAt": "2019", "author": "Jane C. Ginsburg; Luke Ali Budiardjo", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "以作品构思和执行为两项支柱分析机器辅助创作，主张关键问题不是机器能否成为作者，而是设计者或使用者的人类贡献是否足以构成作者身份。", "venue": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal 34(2): 343–448", "publisher": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "model-output", "agentic-action" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "familyId": "knowledge-family-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "title": "生成式 AI 遇上版权法", "originalTitle": "Generative AI Meets Copyright", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "science", "publishedAt": "2023-07-14", "author": "Pamela Samuelson", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "概述生成式 AI 训练与输出引发的版权诉讼路径，强调合理使用是逐案判断，正在进行的案件会同时影响开发者、部署者和普通使用者。", "venue": "Science 381(6654): 158–161", "publisher": "American Association for the Advancement of Science", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": true }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-15-matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-text-and-arrangement", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-15-matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure-knowledge-authors-and-machines", "matterId": "matter-15", "issueId": "matter-15:issue-registration-disclosure", "documentId": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "提供以构思和执行衡量人类作者贡献的框架，可比较不同提示、选择和编辑行为。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-authors-and-machines", "familyId": "knowledge-family-authors-and-machines", "title": "作者与机器", "originalTitle": "Authors and Machines", "url": "https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SF2MC24", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "berkeley-technology-law-journal", "publishedAt": "2019", "author": "Jane C. Ginsburg; Luke Ali Budiardjo", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "以作品构思和执行为两项支柱分析机器辅助创作，主张关键问题不是机器能否成为作者，而是设计者或使用者的人类贡献是否足以构成作者身份。", "venue": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal 34(2): 343–448", "publisher": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.15779/Z38SF2MC24" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "model-output", "agentic-action" ] } } ], "sources": [ { "id": "us-copyright-office", "slug": "us-copyright-office", "name": "U.S. Copyright Office", "homepage": "https://www.copyright.gov/", "type": "regulator", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "berkeley-technology-law-journal", "slug": "berkeley-technology-law-journal", "name": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal", "homepage": "https://btlj.org/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "学生编辑科技法评论，由 Berkeley Law 保存稳定卷期和仓储记录。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 24, "corrections": 16, "ownershipTransparency": 18, "expertise": 18, "historicalAccuracy": 12, "total": 88 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "science", "slug": "science", "name": "Science", "homepage": "https://www.science.org/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "AAAS 出版的学术期刊，具有 DOI、作者和卷期记录；评论栏目不自动标记为同行评审研究。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 19, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 99 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "lawfare", "slug": "lawfare", "name": "Lawfare", "homepage": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/", "type": "newsroom", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "作者和编辑准则公开，长期提供国家安全、平台治理和科技法分析；具体案件结论仍回溯官方材料。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 23, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 19, "historicalAccuracy": 13, "total": 92 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16", "ingestion": { "feedEnabled": false, "feedUrl": null, "verification": "not-verified", "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links" } } ], "canonicalUrl": "/cases/zarya-of-the-dawn-registration" }