{
  "schemaVersion": "2.0",
  "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T13:44:57.249Z",
  "compatibility": {
    "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true,
    "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true
  },
  "matter": {
    "id": "matter-13",
    "slug": "united-states-v-realpage",
    "titleZh": "美国诉 RealPage 算法定价案",
    "formalName": "United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.",
    "aliases": [
      "DOJ RealPage",
      "RealPage algorithmic pricing case"
    ],
    "summary": "美国司法部与多州指控 RealPage 利用房东共享的非公开信息生成租金建议，构成限制竞争和垄断行为。2025 年双方提交拟议同意判决。",
    "professionalSummary": "诉状依据《谢尔曼法》第 1、2 条，聚焦共同算法、竞争敏感信息交换与采纳机制；拟议救济限制实时使用竞争者非公开数据并设置监督。",
    "whyItMatters": "它是执法机构把传统信息交换与合谋理论应用于算法定价的旗舰案件。",
    "status": "active",
    "primaryTopic": "competition",
    "secondaryTopics": [
      "consumer-protection"
    ],
    "aiRoles": [
      "automated-decision",
      "training-data"
    ],
    "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·北卡罗来纳中区",
    "industries": [
      "住房",
      "物业科技"
    ],
    "significance": {
      "legalNovelty": 28,
      "impactScope": 25,
      "institutionalLevel": 19,
      "crossBorder": 4,
      "sustainedCoverage": 15,
      "total": 91
    },
    "highProfile": true,
    "featured": true,
    "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-15",
    "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16",
    "proceedings": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:proceeding-1",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "formalName": "United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.",
        "identifier": "1:24-cv-00710",
        "identifiers": {
          "docketNumber": "1:24-cv-00710"
        },
        "forum": "U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina",
        "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·北卡罗来纳中区",
        "type": "civil-litigation",
        "stage": "settlement",
        "status": "active",
        "startedAt": "2025-11-24",
        "precedentialWeight": "not-applicable",
        "officialUrl": "https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/proposed-final-judgment-298"
      }
    ],
    "events": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:event-1",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "proceedingId": "matter-13:proceeding-1",
        "date": "2025-11-24",
        "type": "settlement",
        "title": "司法部与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决",
        "summary": "美国及州原告与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决；在法院依 Tunney Act 审查并录入前，不应把它展示为已经生效的最终判决。",
        "documentIds": [
          "matter-13:document-1"
        ],
        "claimIds": [
          "matter-13:claim-1",
          "matter-13:claim-procedure",
          "matter-13:claim-event"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "documents": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:document-1",
        "familyId": "matter-13:family-1",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "eventId": "matter-13:event-1",
        "title": "Proposed Final Judgment — U.S. and Plaintiff States v. RealPage",
        "originalTitle": "Proposed Final Judgment — U.S. and Plaintiff States v. RealPage",
        "url": "https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/proposed-final-judgment-298",
        "kind": "official-document",
        "sourceId": "doj",
        "publishedAt": "2025-11-24",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "primary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {
          "docketNumber": "1:24-cv-00710"
        },
        "language": "en"
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:claim-1",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "eventId": "matter-13:event-1",
        "text": "美国及州原告与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决；在法院依 Tunney Act 审查并录入前，不应把它展示为已经生效的最终判决。",
        "kind": "procedural-fact",
        "status": "confirmed",
        "documentIds": [
          "matter-13:document-1"
        ],
        "asOf": "2025-11-24"
      },
      {
        "id": "matter-13:claim-procedure",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "eventId": "matter-13:event-1",
        "text": "1:24-cv-00710 是本站记录的正式程序编号，程序由 U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina 处理。",
        "kind": "procedural-fact",
        "status": "confirmed",
        "documentIds": [
          "matter-13:document-1"
        ],
        "asOf": "2025-11-24"
      },
      {
        "id": "matter-13:claim-event",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "eventId": "matter-13:event-1",
        "text": "2025-11-24，案卷记录“司法部与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决”这一程序节点；该日期与事件由所引直接材料支持。",
        "kind": "procedural-fact",
        "status": "confirmed",
        "documentIds": [
          "matter-13:document-1"
        ],
        "asOf": "2025-11-24"
      }
    ],
    "caseBackground": {
      "narrativeZh": "美国司法部与多州起诉 RealPage，指控其利用房东共享的非公开竞争信息生成租金建议，并通过共同算法及采纳机制限制竞争、维持垄断。双方于 2025 年提交拟议最终判决，但仍需法院依 Tunney Act 审查和录入才会成为生效命令。",
      "partiesZh": [
        "美国司法部及多州原告",
        "RealPage, Inc."
      ],
      "aiSystemZh": "RealPage 租金建议与算法定价系统",
      "challengedConductZh": "汇集房东的非公开竞争敏感信息形成租金建议，并通过相关机制促使市场参与者采纳。",
      "allegedHarmZh": "政府原告主张租赁住房市场的独立定价竞争被削弱并形成垄断性影响；拟议和解不是法院实体认定。",
      "proceduralOriginZh": "美国及州原告以 1:24-cv-00710 起诉；2025 年 11 月 24 日与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决，等待 Tunney Act 审查。",
      "claimIds": [
        "matter-13:claim-1",
        "matter-13:claim-procedure",
        "matter-13:claim-event"
      ],
      "documentIds": [
        "matter-13:document-1"
      ]
    },
    "issues": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "titleZh": "共享非公开数据与共同定价",
        "questionZh": "竞争房东向同一算法提供非公开租金数据并接收建议，是否构成《谢尔曼法》第 1 条所禁止的协调？",
        "contextZh": "争点不是算法是否使用 AI 标签，而是竞争敏感信息交换、共同建议和采纳机制是否替代独立定价。",
        "topic": "competition",
        "status": "contested",
        "courtTreatmentZh": "政府已提出限制竞争指控，但拟议最终判决尚待法院审查，现有案卷没有实体责任判决。",
        "claimIds": [
          "matter-13:claim-1"
        ],
        "positions": [
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion:position-1",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
            "sideZh": "美国及州原告",
            "positionZh": "主张 RealPage 通过非公开竞争者数据和共同算法促进限制竞争。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          },
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion:position-2",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
            "sideZh": "RealPage",
            "positionZh": "已与政府提交拟议最终判决；现有公开材料未见其承认全部实体指控。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "titleZh": "算法租金服务市场的垄断行为",
        "questionZh": "RealPage 的数据规模、产品机制和市场行为是否构成《谢尔曼法》第 2 条下的垄断或维持垄断？",
        "contextZh": "该路径要求证明相关市场、市场力量与排除性行为，不能仅由产品被大量房东采用推定。",
        "topic": "competition",
        "status": "open",
        "claimIds": [],
        "positions": [
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-monopolization:position-1",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
            "sideZh": "美国及州原告",
            "positionZh": "诉状依据《谢尔曼法》第 2 条提出垄断相关请求。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          },
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-monopolization:position-2",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
            "sideZh": "RealPage",
            "positionZh": "当前案卷未显示其承认垄断；拟议判决也不能替代法院对要件的裁判。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "titleZh": "数据使用限制与同意判决生效",
        "questionZh": "拟议判决对实时使用竞争者非公开数据和监督机制设置哪些约束，何时具有法律效力？",
        "contextZh": "双方提交的文本只是拟议救济，须经 Tunney Act 公共利益审查并由法院录入。",
        "topic": "competition",
        "status": "open",
        "courtTreatmentZh": "截至现有案卷日期，法院尚未录入拟议最终判决，因此所列数据限制和监督尚不能标为生效命令。",
        "claimIds": [
          "matter-13:claim-1"
        ],
        "positions": [
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies:position-1",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
            "sideZh": "和解双方",
            "positionZh": "共同提出限制实时使用竞争者非公开数据并设置监督的拟议救济。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          },
          {
            "id": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies:position-2",
            "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
            "sideZh": "法院程序状态",
            "positionZh": "是否录入及最终范围须经 Tunney Act 审查，提交本身不产生终局效力。",
            "claimIds": [],
            "documentIds": []
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "id": "matter-13:decision-1",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "proceedingId": "matter-13:proceeding-1",
        "eventId": "matter-13:event-1",
        "date": "2025-11-24",
        "outcomeZh": "美国、州原告与 RealPage 提交拟议最终判决；法院尚未依 Tunney Act 审查并录入，因此目前没有生效的最终判决。",
        "holdingsZh": [
          "本事件只确认拟议判决已提交，不包含法院对《谢尔曼法》责任的实体认定。",
          "拟议救济在法院录入前不具有最终判决效力。"
        ],
        "reasoningZh": [
          "反垄断同意判决须经过 Tunney Act 公共利益审查，双方协议不能自行替代法院录入。",
          "因此网站只能展示拟议条款和程序状态，不能把政府指控升级为经审事实。"
        ],
        "reliefZh": "拟议救济将限制实时使用竞争者非公开数据并设置监督；由于尚未录入，目前没有已经生效的法院救济。",
        "scopeAndLimitsZh": "即使最终录入，条款也针对 RealPage 的数据和定价机制，不自动裁判其他算法定价产品。",
        "precedentialWeight": "not-applicable",
        "appealStatusZh": "案件尚待地区法院完成 Tunney Act 审查，没有终局判决可供上诉；Matter 仍标记为活跃。",
        "documentIds": [
          "matter-13:document-1"
        ],
        "claimIds": [
          "matter-13:claim-1"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "issueDocumentLinks": [
      {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.9,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-monopolization-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-monopolization-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.9,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      }
    ]
  },
  "issueDocuments": [
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "familyId": "knowledge-family-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "title": "第三方定价算法下的轴辐式合谋",
        "originalTitle": "Hub-and-Spoke Collusion With a Third-Party Pricing Algorithm",
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70017",
        "kind": "academic-research",
        "sourceId": "journal-industrial-economics",
        "publishedAt": "2026-01-13",
        "author": "Joseph E. Harrington Jr.",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {
          "doi": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "建立第三方数据分析商作为枢纽、采用者作为辐条的定价模型，解释提高定价效率的同一服务为何也可能便利协调和超竞争加价。",
          "venue": "The Journal of Industrial Economics 74(2): 181–196",
          "publisher": "Wiley",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": true,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "stableIdentifier": {
          "kind": "doi",
          "value": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "platform-liability"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-shared-data-collusion",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.9,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "familyId": "news-family-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "title": "美国各州如何应对算法定价",
        "originalTitle": "How States Are Taking on Algorithmic Pricing",
        "url": "https://www.techpolicy.press/how-states-are-taking-on-algorithmic-pricing/",
        "kind": "professional-commentary",
        "sourceId": "tech-policy-press",
        "publishedAt": "2026-03-20",
        "author": "Max Morgan",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {},
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "文章追踪住房和零售算法定价的州与地方立法，并区分利用竞争者非公开数据的协调风险和针对个人的动态定价问题。",
          "venue": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publisher": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": false,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "editorialSummaryZh": "文章说明算法定价争议已经从反垄断诉讼延伸至州和城市立法。文中对 RealPage 行为的描述属于诉讼指控和政策分析，不是法院事实认定。",
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "consumer-protection"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-monopolization-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "familyId": "knowledge-family-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "title": "第三方定价算法下的轴辐式合谋",
        "originalTitle": "Hub-and-Spoke Collusion With a Third-Party Pricing Algorithm",
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70017",
        "kind": "academic-research",
        "sourceId": "journal-industrial-economics",
        "publishedAt": "2026-01-13",
        "author": "Joseph E. Harrington Jr.",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {
          "doi": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "建立第三方数据分析商作为枢纽、采用者作为辐条的定价模型，解释提高定价效率的同一服务为何也可能便利协调和超竞争加价。",
          "venue": "The Journal of Industrial Economics 74(2): 181–196",
          "publisher": "Wiley",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": true,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "stableIdentifier": {
          "kind": "doi",
          "value": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "platform-liability"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-monopolization-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-monopolization",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.9,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "familyId": "news-family-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "title": "美国各州如何应对算法定价",
        "originalTitle": "How States Are Taking on Algorithmic Pricing",
        "url": "https://www.techpolicy.press/how-states-are-taking-on-algorithmic-pricing/",
        "kind": "professional-commentary",
        "sourceId": "tech-policy-press",
        "publishedAt": "2026-03-20",
        "author": "Max Morgan",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {},
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "文章追踪住房和零售算法定价的州与地方立法，并区分利用竞争者非公开数据的协调风险和针对个人的动态定价问题。",
          "venue": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publisher": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": false,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "editorialSummaryZh": "文章说明算法定价争议已经从反垄断诉讼延伸至州和城市立法。文中对 RealPage 行为的描述属于诉讼指控和政策分析，不是法院事实认定。",
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "consumer-protection"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "issue-document-matter-13-matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies-knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
        "documentId": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "relationship": "doctrinal-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "为共同定价服务商作为枢纽、竞争者作为辐条的协调机制和效率抗辩提供理论背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。",
        "viewpoint": "descriptive",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "knowledge-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "familyId": "knowledge-family-hub-spoke-pricing-algorithm",
        "title": "第三方定价算法下的轴辐式合谋",
        "originalTitle": "Hub-and-Spoke Collusion With a Third-Party Pricing Algorithm",
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70017",
        "kind": "academic-research",
        "sourceId": "journal-industrial-economics",
        "publishedAt": "2026-01-13",
        "author": "Joseph E. Harrington Jr.",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {
          "doi": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "建立第三方数据分析商作为枢纽、采用者作为辐条的定价模型，解释提高定价效率的同一服务为何也可能便利协调和超竞争加价。",
          "venue": "The Journal of Industrial Economics 74(2): 181–196",
          "publisher": "Wiley",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": true,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "stableIdentifier": {
          "kind": "doi",
          "value": "10.1111/joie.70017"
        },
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "platform-liability"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "link": {
        "id": "news-context-link-matter-13-matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies-news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "matterId": "matter-13",
        "issueId": "matter-13:issue-proposed-remedies",
        "documentId": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "relationship": "news-context",
        "relevanceSummaryZh": "补充算法定价案件之外的州和地方立法反应，并区分协调定价和个性化定价风险。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。",
        "viewpoint": "critical",
        "confidence": 0.8500000000000001,
        "assignedBy": "rule"
      },
      "document": {
        "id": "news-context-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "familyId": "news-family-states-algorithmic-pricing",
        "title": "美国各州如何应对算法定价",
        "originalTitle": "How States Are Taking on Algorithmic Pricing",
        "url": "https://www.techpolicy.press/how-states-are-taking-on-algorithmic-pricing/",
        "kind": "professional-commentary",
        "sourceId": "tech-policy-press",
        "publishedAt": "2026-03-20",
        "author": "Max Morgan",
        "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
        "relationship": "independent",
        "identifiers": {},
        "language": "en",
        "metadata": {
          "abstractZh": "文章追踪住房和零售算法定价的州与地方立法，并区分利用竞争者非公开数据的协调风险和针对个人的动态定价问题。",
          "venue": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publisher": "Tech Policy Press",
          "publicationState": "published",
          "peerReviewed": false,
          "paywalled": false
        },
        "editorialSummaryZh": "文章说明算法定价争议已经从反垄断诉讼延伸至州和城市立法。文中对 RealPage 行为的描述属于诉讼指控和政策分析，不是法院事实认定。",
        "legalTopics": [
          "competition",
          "consumer-protection"
        ],
        "aiRoles": [
          "automated-decision",
          "agentic-action"
        ]
      }
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "doj",
      "slug": "doj",
      "name": "U.S. Department of Justice",
      "homepage": "https://www.justice.gov/",
      "type": "government",
      "grade": "A",
      "primaryOrSecondary": "primary",
      "score": {
        "traceability": 25,
        "corrections": 18,
        "ownershipTransparency": 20,
        "expertise": 20,
        "historicalAccuracy": 15,
        "total": 98
      },
      "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。",
      "methodologyVersion": "1.0",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "journal-industrial-economics",
      "slug": "journal-industrial-economics",
      "name": "The Journal of Industrial Economics",
      "homepage": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14676451",
      "type": "academic",
      "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
      "rationale": "同行评审产业组织期刊，出版页提供 DOI、作者、接受与正式发表日期。",
      "grade": "A",
      "score": {
        "traceability": 25,
        "corrections": 18,
        "ownershipTransparency": 19,
        "expertise": 20,
        "historicalAccuracy": 14,
        "total": 96
      },
      "methodologyVersion": "1.0",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "tech-policy-press",
      "slug": "tech-policy-press",
      "name": "Tech Policy Press",
      "homepage": "https://www.techpolicy.press/",
      "type": "newsroom",
      "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary",
      "rationale": "专注技术政策的编辑型出版物，作者与利益关系按篇核验，观点内容不作案件事实。",
      "grade": "A",
      "score": {
        "traceability": 22,
        "corrections": 16,
        "ownershipTransparency": 18,
        "expertise": 18,
        "historicalAccuracy": 12,
        "total": 86
      },
      "methodologyVersion": "1.0",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16",
      "ingestion": {
        "feedEnabled": false,
        "feedUrl": null,
        "verification": "not-verified",
        "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links"
      }
    }
  ],
  "canonicalUrl": "/cases/united-states-v-realpage"
}