{ "schemaVersion": "2.0", "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T13:44:57.273Z", "compatibility": { "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true, "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true }, "matter": { "id": "matter-35", "slug": "glukhin-v-russia", "titleZh": "Glukhin 诉俄罗斯人脸识别监控案", "formalName": "Glukhin v. Russia", "aliases": [ "ECHR facial recognition protest case", "Glukhin v Russia" ], "summary": "欧洲人权法院认定，俄罗斯利用人脸识别识别、定位并逮捕一名和平示威者，不符合必要性要求，侵犯其隐私和表达自由。", "professionalSummary": "申请号 11519/20 的判决依据《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条和第 10 条，特别关注敏感生物识别处理、和平表达与缺乏充分保障。", "whyItMatters": "它是欧洲人权法院直接审查人脸识别用于追踪示威者的标志性判决。", "status": "decided", "primaryTopic": "public-law-human-rights", "secondaryTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ], "jurisdiction": "欧洲人权法院", "industries": [ "执法", "公共监控" ], "significance": { "legalNovelty": 28, "impactScope": 22, "institutionalLevel": 20, "crossBorder": 9, "sustainedCoverage": 13, "total": 92 }, "highProfile": true, "featured": false, "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-15", "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16", "proceedings": [ { "id": "matter-35:proceeding-1", "matterId": "matter-35", "formalName": "Glukhin v. Russia", "identifier": "Application no. 11519/20", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "11519/20" }, "forum": "European Court of Human Rights", "jurisdiction": "欧洲人权法院", "type": "judicial-review", "stage": "judgment", "status": "decided", "startedAt": "2023-07-04", "precedentialWeight": "binding", "officialUrl": "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225655" } ], "events": [ { "id": "matter-35:event-1", "matterId": "matter-35", "proceedingId": "matter-35:proceeding-1", "date": "2023-07-04", "type": "judgment", "title": "欧洲人权法院认定违反第 8 条和第 10 条", "summary": "欧洲人权法院认定使用人脸识别定位和平示威者不具必要性，违反隐私权和表达自由。", "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-35:claim-1", "matter-35:claim-procedure", "matter-35:claim-event" ] } ], "documents": [ { "id": "matter-35:document-1", "familyId": "matter-35:family-1", "matterId": "matter-35", "eventId": "matter-35:event-1", "title": "Case of Glukhin v. Russia — application no. 11519/20", "originalTitle": "Case of Glukhin v. Russia — application no. 11519/20", "url": "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225655", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "echr", "publishedAt": "2023-07-04", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "11519/20" }, "language": "en" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "matter-35:claim-1", "matterId": "matter-35", "eventId": "matter-35:event-1", "text": "欧洲人权法院认定使用人脸识别定位和平示威者不具必要性，违反隐私权和表达自由。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-07-04" }, { "id": "matter-35:claim-procedure", "matterId": "matter-35", "eventId": "matter-35:event-1", "text": "Application no. 11519/20 是本站记录的正式程序编号，程序由 European Court of Human Rights 处理。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-07-04" }, { "id": "matter-35:claim-event", "matterId": "matter-35", "eventId": "matter-35:event-1", "text": "2023-07-04，案卷记录“欧洲人权法院认定违反第 8 条和第 10 条”这一程序节点；该日期与事件由所引直接材料支持。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ], "asOf": "2023-07-04" } ], "caseBackground": { "narrativeZh": "俄罗斯机关利用人脸识别识别、定位并逮捕参与和平示威的 Glukhin。Glukhin 以隐私和表达自由受到侵犯为由向欧洲人权法院申请；该院在申请号 11519/20 中于 2023 年 7 月 4 日认定违反《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条和第 10 条。", "partiesZh": [ "申请人：Glukhin", "被申请国：俄罗斯" ], "aiSystemZh": "用于识别和定位示威者的人脸识别监控系统", "challengedConductZh": "使用人脸识别识别、定位并逮捕一名和平示威者。", "allegedHarmZh": "Glukhin 主张敏感生物识别监控侵犯其隐私权和和平表达自由。", "proceduralOriginZh": "Glukhin 向欧洲人权法院提出申请 11519/20；法院于 2023 年 7 月 4 日作出判决。", "claimIds": [ "matter-35:claim-1", "matter-35:claim-procedure", "matter-35:claim-event" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ] }, "issues": [ { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "matterId": "matter-35", "titleZh": "用人脸识别追踪和平示威者是否必要", "questionZh": "国家使用人脸识别识别和定位和平示威者，是否符合第 8 条对隐私干预必要性的要求？", "contextZh": "生物识别使国家能够从公共空间影像中持续识别个人，处理敏感度高于一般目视观察。", "topic": "privacy-data-protection", "status": "resolved", "courtTreatmentZh": "欧洲人权法院认定该使用不具必要性，构成对第 8 条隐私权的违反。", "claimIds": [ "matter-35:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity:position-1", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "sideZh": "Glukhin", "positionZh": "主张为追踪其和平示威而处理生物识别数据缺乏必要性。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity:position-2", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "sideZh": "俄罗斯", "positionZh": "底库未收录其对人脸识别必要性的具体完整答辩。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "matterId": "matter-35", "titleZh": "生物识别监控对和平表达的干预", "questionZh": "使用人脸识别识别并逮捕和平示威者是否侵犯第 10 条表达自由？", "contextZh": "监控技术不仅处理个人数据，也可能直接影响个人参与和平表达的能力。", "topic": "public-law-human-rights", "status": "resolved", "courtTreatmentZh": "欧洲人权法院认定相关措施违反第 10 条表达自由。", "claimIds": [ "matter-35:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression:position-1", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "sideZh": "Glukhin", "positionZh": "主张因和平表达而被人脸识别追踪和逮捕侵犯其表达自由。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression:position-2", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "sideZh": "俄罗斯", "positionZh": "底库未记录其针对第 10 条请求的完整正当化理由。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "matter-35:issue-safeguards", "matterId": "matter-35", "titleZh": "敏感生物识别处理的保障", "questionZh": "国家以人脸识别定位个人时，现有法律与程序保障是否足以防止滥用？", "contextZh": "缺乏充分保障会加重对和平表达者使用人脸识别的干预严重性。", "topic": "public-law-human-rights", "status": "open", "claimIds": [], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-35:issue-safeguards:position-1", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-safeguards", "sideZh": "Glukhin", "positionZh": "主张现有保障不足以正当化对其使用人脸识别。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-35:issue-safeguards:position-2", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-safeguards", "sideZh": "俄罗斯", "positionZh": "现有底库未列明其所主张的具体保障措施。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] } ], "decisions": [ { "id": "matter-35:decision-1", "matterId": "matter-35", "proceedingId": "matter-35:proceeding-1", "eventId": "matter-35:event-1", "date": "2023-07-04", "outcomeZh": "欧洲人权法院认定，俄罗斯使用人脸识别识别、定位并逮捕和平示威者违反第 8 条隐私权和第 10 条表达自由。", "holdingsZh": [ "针对和平示威者的人脸识别使用不符合必要性要求。", "敏感生物识别处理侵犯申请人的第 8 条权利。", "以该技术追踪并逮捕和平示威者侵犯申请人的第 10 条权利。" ], "reasoningZh": [ "人脸识别对个人进行识别和定位，构成高度敏感的生物识别处理。", "当目标行为属于和平表达且保障不足时，国家无法证明该强度监控具有必要性。" ], "reliefZh": "现有底库确认两项公约违反，但未记录金钱赔偿或其他具体救济，故不补写。", "scopeAndLimitsZh": "裁判针对以人脸识别追踪和平示威者的具体事实，并非宣布执法机关任何人脸识别使用都当然违反公约。", "precedentialWeight": "binding", "appealStatusZh": "欧洲人权法院于 2023 年 7 月 4 日作出判决；底库未记录转交大审判庭或其他改变该结论的程序。", "documentIds": [ "matter-35:document-1" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-35:claim-1" ] } ], "issueDocumentLinks": [ { "id": "issue-document-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity-knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "documentId": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "relationship": "empirical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "以公开记录调查说明执法场景中数据库规模、观察名单、准确率和监督机制为何需要分别核验。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-10-expression-knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "documentId": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "relationship": "empirical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "以公开记录调查说明执法场景中数据库规模、观察名单、准确率和监督机制为何需要分别核验。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-10-expression-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-safeguards-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-safeguards", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" } ] }, "issueDocuments": [ { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity-knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "documentId": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "relationship": "empirical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "以公开记录调查说明执法场景中数据库规模、观察名单、准确率和监督机制为何需要分别核验。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "familyId": "knowledge-family-perpetual-line-up", "title": "永久列队：美国未受规制的警务人脸识别", "originalTitle": "The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America", "url": "https://www.law.georgetown.edu/privacy-technology-center/research/the-perpetual-line-up/", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "georgetown-center-privacy-technology", "publishedAt": "2016-10-18", "author": "Clare Garvie; Alvaro M. Bedoya; Jonathan Frankle", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "依据一百余项信息公开请求和访谈调查警务人脸识别数据库的规模、准确率测试、观察名单、透明度和监督缺口，并把技术使用放回执法权力与程序保障中评价。", "venue": "Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology Research Report", "publisher": "Georgetown University Law Center", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "repository-record", "value": "georgetown-cpt:perpetual-line-up:2016" }, "legalTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "public-law-human-rights", "discrimination" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-8-necessity", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "familyId": "news-family-facial-recognition-challenges", "title": "人脸识别技术带来的法律与社会挑战", "originalTitle": "The Challenges of Facial Recognition Technologies", "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/news/challenges-facial-recognition-technologies", "kind": "factual-report", "sourceId": "stanford-hai", "publishedAt": "2020-04-23", "author": "Shana Lynch", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "报道以 Marietje Schaake 的研究和政策观察为主线，梳理人脸识别在偏差、无感收集、数据所有权、执法监控与跨场景滥用方面的问题。", "venue": "Stanford HAI News", "publisher": "Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇机构报道把商业认证、公共空间追踪与执法识别放在同一风险图景中，适合为 Clearview、BIPA 和中国人脸识别案件提供背景，但不评价具体算法的准确率。", "legalTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "discrimination", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-10-expression-knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "documentId": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "relationship": "empirical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "以公开记录调查说明执法场景中数据库规模、观察名单、准确率和监督机制为何需要分别核验。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-perpetual-line-up", "familyId": "knowledge-family-perpetual-line-up", "title": "永久列队：美国未受规制的警务人脸识别", "originalTitle": "The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America", "url": "https://www.law.georgetown.edu/privacy-technology-center/research/the-perpetual-line-up/", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "georgetown-center-privacy-technology", "publishedAt": "2016-10-18", "author": "Clare Garvie; Alvaro M. Bedoya; Jonathan Frankle", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "依据一百余项信息公开请求和访谈调查警务人脸识别数据库的规模、准确率测试、观察名单、透明度和监督缺口，并把技术使用放回执法权力与程序保障中评价。", "venue": "Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology Research Report", "publisher": "Georgetown University Law Center", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "repository-record", "value": "georgetown-cpt:perpetual-line-up:2016" }, "legalTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "public-law-human-rights", "discrimination" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-article-10-expression-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-article-10-expression", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "familyId": "news-family-facial-recognition-challenges", "title": "人脸识别技术带来的法律与社会挑战", "originalTitle": "The Challenges of Facial Recognition Technologies", "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/news/challenges-facial-recognition-technologies", "kind": "factual-report", "sourceId": "stanford-hai", "publishedAt": "2020-04-23", "author": "Shana Lynch", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "报道以 Marietje Schaake 的研究和政策观察为主线，梳理人脸识别在偏差、无感收集、数据所有权、执法监控与跨场景滥用方面的问题。", "venue": "Stanford HAI News", "publisher": "Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇机构报道把商业认证、公共空间追踪与执法识别放在同一风险图景中，适合为 Clearview、BIPA 和中国人脸识别案件提供背景，但不评价具体算法的准确率。", "legalTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "discrimination", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-35-matter-35:issue-safeguards-news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "matterId": "matter-35", "issueId": "matter-35:issue-safeguards", "documentId": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为生物识别案件提供无感收集、执法使用、偏差和跨场景滥用的社会与政策背景。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-facial-recognition-challenges", "familyId": "news-family-facial-recognition-challenges", "title": "人脸识别技术带来的法律与社会挑战", "originalTitle": "The Challenges of Facial Recognition Technologies", "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/news/challenges-facial-recognition-technologies", "kind": "factual-report", "sourceId": "stanford-hai", "publishedAt": "2020-04-23", "author": "Shana Lynch", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "报道以 Marietje Schaake 的研究和政策观察为主线，梳理人脸识别在偏差、无感收集、数据所有权、执法监控与跨场景滥用方面的问题。", "venue": "Stanford HAI News", "publisher": "Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇机构报道把商业认证、公共空间追踪与执法识别放在同一风险图景中，适合为 Clearview、BIPA 和中国人脸识别案件提供背景，但不评价具体算法的准确率。", "legalTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "discrimination", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "biometrics", "automated-decision" ] } } ], "sources": [ { "id": "echr", "slug": "echr", "name": "European Court of Human Rights / HUDOC", "homepage": "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/", "type": "court", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "georgetown-center-privacy-technology", "slug": "georgetown-center-privacy-technology", "name": "Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology", "homepage": "https://www.law.georgetown.edu/privacy-technology-center/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "大学法学院研究中心，调查报告公开作者、方法、原始信息请求范围及稳定项目页。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 14, "total": 97 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "stanford-hai", "slug": "stanford-hai", "name": "Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence", "homepage": "https://hai.stanford.edu/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "mixed", "rationale": "大学研究机构发布研究、政策简报与新闻；按具体作者和文类区分一手研究与机构评论。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 23, "corrections": 16, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 12, "total": 90 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16", "ingestion": { "feedEnabled": false, "feedUrl": null, "verification": "not-verified", "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links" } } ], "canonicalUrl": "/cases/glukhin-v-russia" }