{ "schemaVersion": "2.0", "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T13:44:57.242Z", "compatibility": { "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true, "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true }, "matter": { "id": "matter-07", "slug": "doe-v-github-copilot", "titleZh": "Doe 诉 GitHub Copilot 案", "formalName": "Doe 1 et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al.", "aliases": [ "GitHub Copilot Litigation", "Doe v. GitHub" ], "summary": "匿名开发者就 GitHub Copilot 使用开源代码训练及输出代码提起诉讼。法院对 DMCA 著作权管理信息等请求作出多轮驳回，部分问题进入上诉程序。", "professionalSummary": "核心程序争议包括原告资格、输出与原代码的同一性要求、DMCA 1202(b) 以及合同与开源许可主张。", "whyItMatters": "它把开源许可证、代码生成和 DMCA 元数据义务连接在一起。", "status": "on-appeal", "primaryTopic": "copyright", "secondaryTopics": [ "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output" ], "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区", "industries": [ "软件开发", "生成式 AI" ], "significance": { "legalNovelty": 27, "impactScope": 22, "institutionalLevel": 16, "crossBorder": 6, "sustainedCoverage": 14, "total": 85 }, "highProfile": true, "featured": false, "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-15", "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16", "proceedings": [ { "id": "matter-07:proceeding-1", "matterId": "matter-07", "formalName": "Doe 1 et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al.", "identifier": "4:22-cv-06823-JST", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "4:22-cv-06823-JST" }, "forum": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California", "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区", "type": "civil-litigation", "stage": "discovery", "status": "active", "startedAt": "2024-09-27", "precedentialWeight": "pending-appeal", "officialUrl": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-4_22-cv-06823/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-4_22-cv-06823-3.pdf" }, { "id": "matter-07:proceeding-2", "matterId": "matter-07", "formalName": "Doe et al. v. GitHub, Inc. et al. — interlocutory appeal", "identifier": "24-7700", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "24-7700" }, "forum": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit", "jurisdiction": "美国·联邦·加州北区", "type": "civil-litigation", "stage": "appeal", "status": "on-appeal", "startedAt": "2024-12-23", "precedentialWeight": "pending-appeal", "officialUrl": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/24-7700" } ], "events": [ { "id": "matter-07:event-1", "matterId": "matter-07", "proceedingId": "matter-07:proceeding-1", "date": "2024-09-27", "type": "appeal", "title": "法院认证部分问题供中间上诉", "summary": "地区法院认证其 DMCA 驳回命令中的控制性法律问题供中间上诉审查。", "documentIds": [ "matter-07:document-1" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-07:claim-1", "matter-07:claim-procedure", "matter-07:claim-event" ] } ], "documents": [ { "id": "matter-07:document-1", "familyId": "matter-07:family-1", "matterId": "matter-07", "eventId": "matter-07:event-1", "title": "Doe 1 v. GitHub — Order certifying interlocutory appeal", "originalTitle": "Doe 1 v. GitHub — Order certifying interlocutory appeal", "url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-4_22-cv-06823/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-4_22-cv-06823-3.pdf", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "govinfo", "publishedAt": "2024-09-27", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "4:22-cv-06823-JST" }, "language": "en" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "matter-07:claim-1", "matterId": "matter-07", "eventId": "matter-07:event-1", "text": "地区法院认证其 DMCA 驳回命令中的控制性法律问题供中间上诉审查。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-07:document-1" ], "asOf": "2024-09-27" }, { "id": "matter-07:claim-procedure", "matterId": "matter-07", "eventId": "matter-07:event-1", "text": "4:22-cv-06823-JST 是本站记录的正式程序编号，程序由 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California 处理。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-07:document-1" ], "asOf": "2024-09-27" }, { "id": "matter-07:claim-event", "matterId": "matter-07", "eventId": "matter-07:event-1", "text": "2024-09-27，案卷记录“法院认证部分问题供中间上诉”这一程序节点；该日期与事件由所引直接材料支持。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "documentIds": [ "matter-07:document-1" ], "asOf": "2024-09-27" } ], "caseBackground": { "narrativeZh": "匿名开发者起诉 GitHub 等 Copilot 相关主体，挑战 GitHub Copilot 使用开源代码训练并生成代码的方式。案件经历多轮驳回，争议集中在原告资格、输出与原代码的同一性、DMCA 著作权管理信息以及开源许可和合同义务；部分 DMCA 问题获准中间上诉。", "partiesZh": [ "匿名开源代码开发者", "GitHub 等 Copilot 相关被告" ], "aiSystemZh": "GitHub Copilot", "challengedConductZh": "使用开源代码训练代码生成系统，并输出被指未保留许可或著作权管理信息的代码。", "allegedHarmZh": "原告主张代码权益、开源许可条件和 DMCA 管理信息义务受到侵害。", "proceduralOriginZh": "案件以 4:22-cv-06823-JST 提起；地区法院于 2024 年 9 月 27 日认证控制性 DMCA 法律问题供中间上诉，第九巡回案号为 24-7700。", "claimIds": [ "matter-07:claim-1", "matter-07:claim-procedure", "matter-07:claim-event" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-07:document-1" ] }, "issues": [ { "id": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match", "matterId": "matter-07", "titleZh": "原告资格与具体输出对应", "questionZh": "匿名开发者能否把其具体代码与 Copilot 的具体输出对应，从而证明可审理的个人损害？", "contextZh": "代码进入训练集不必然证明产品输出了某一原告代码，原告资格与具体输出证据因此相互关联。", "topic": "copyright", "status": "contested", "courtTreatmentZh": "法院在多轮驳回中审查原告资格和输出对应要求，案件仍处于继续程序及上诉轨道。", "claimIds": [ "matter-07:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match:position-1", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match", "sideZh": "匿名开发者", "positionZh": "主张其开源代码被用于训练，且 Copilot 输出机制对其权利造成可诉损害。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match:position-2", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match", "sideZh": "Copilot 相关被告", "positionZh": "通过驳回动议质疑原告资格及具体输出与原代码的对应程度。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "matterId": "matter-07", "titleZh": "DMCA 管理信息与同一性要求", "questionZh": "Copilot 输出未附原代码的著作权管理信息时，DMCA 1202(b) 是否要求输出与原作品相同或近乎相同？", "contextZh": "该问题决定删除或提供不完整管理信息的主张能否在生成代码并非逐字复制时继续。", "topic": "copyright", "status": "partly-resolved", "courtTreatmentZh": "地区法院驳回相关 DMCA 请求，并认证其中控制性法律问题供第九巡回法院中间上诉。", "claimIds": [ "matter-07:claim-1" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi:position-1", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "sideZh": "匿名开发者", "positionZh": "认为输出代码缺失原有管理信息可触发 DMCA，即使输出并非逐字相同。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi:position-2", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "sideZh": "Copilot 相关被告", "positionZh": "主张缺少足够相同的具体输出时，DMCA 管理信息请求不能成立。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license", "matterId": "matter-07", "titleZh": "开源许可证与合同义务", "questionZh": "Copilot 对开源代码的训练或输出是否违反署名、许可通知等开源许可条件或合同承诺？", "contextZh": "该争点独立于代码是否满足著作权实质性相似，取决于许可条件、当事方关系和输出事实。", "topic": "platform-liability", "status": "open", "claimIds": [], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license:position-1", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license", "sideZh": "匿名开发者", "positionZh": "主张使用及输出开源代码时未遵守相应许可和署名条件。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] }, { "id": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license:position-2", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license", "sideZh": "Copilot 相关被告", "positionZh": "现有公开材料未见其对每一种开源许可和具体输出作出可核验的明确回应；本案卷不代为补写。", "claimIds": [], "documentIds": [] } ] } ], "decisions": [], "issueDocumentLinks": [ { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-07-matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-open-source-license-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 3 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.95, "assignedBy": "rule" } ] }, "issueDocuments": [ { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-standing-and-output-match", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-07-matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi-knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "documentId": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于概览生成式 AI 版权诉讼的主要请求与尚未形成定论的合理使用问题。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "familyId": "knowledge-family-generative-ai-meets-copyright", "title": "生成式 AI 遇上版权法", "originalTitle": "Generative AI Meets Copyright", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "science", "publishedAt": "2023-07-14", "author": "Pamela Samuelson", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "概述生成式 AI 训练与输出引发的版权诉讼路径，强调合理使用是逐案判断，正在进行的案件会同时影响开发者、部署者和普通使用者。", "venue": "Science 381(6654): 158–161", "publisher": "American Association for the Advancement of Science", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": true }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.1126/science.adi0656" }, "legalTopics": [ "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-dmca-cmi", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-07-matter-07:issue-open-source-license-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-07", "issueId": "matter-07:issue-open-source-license", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 3 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.95, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } } ], "sources": [ { "id": "govinfo", "slug": "govinfo", "name": "GovInfo — United States Courts Opinions", "homepage": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/USCOURTS", "type": "government", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "美国政府出版局保存法院提交的判决与命令，具备案号、法院和文书定位。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "lawfare", "slug": "lawfare", "name": "Lawfare", "homepage": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/", "type": "newsroom", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "作者和编辑准则公开，长期提供国家安全、平台治理和科技法分析；具体案件结论仍回溯官方材料。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 23, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 19, "historicalAccuracy": 13, "total": 92 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16", "ingestion": { "feedEnabled": false, "feedUrl": null, "verification": "not-verified", "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links" } }, { "id": "science", "slug": "science", "name": "Science", "homepage": "https://www.science.org/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "AAAS 出版的学术期刊，具有 DOI、作者和卷期记录；评论栏目不自动标记为同行评审研究。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 19, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 99 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" } ], "canonicalUrl": "/cases/doe-v-github-copilot" }