{ "schemaVersion": "2.0", "generatedAt": "2026-07-16T12:09:49.397Z", "compatibility": { "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true, "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true }, "matter": { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "slug": "cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "titleZh": "L2 辅助驾驶醉驾案（指导性案例 271 号）", "formalName": "郭某危险驾驶案", "aliases": [ "指导性案例 271 号", "（2025）浙0113刑初596号", "L2 assisted-driving drunk-driving case" ], "summary": "驾驶人饮酒后启动 L2 辅助驾驶、用装置规避监测并离开驾驶位，法院仍认定其是车辆实际驾驶人，构成危险驾驶罪。", "professionalSummary": "（2025）浙0113刑初596号强调 L2 系驾驶辅助而非自动驾驶，驾驶人负有持续接管和安全注意义务。最高人民法院后将其发布为指导性案例 271 号。", "whyItMatters": "该案把“系统在控制车辆”与法律上的驾驶主体区分开，直接回应辅助驾驶场景中责任不能因自动化而消失。", "status": "decided", "primaryTopic": "professional-responsibility", "secondaryTopics": [ "product-liability", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "automated-decision" ], "jurisdiction": "中国·浙江·杭州市临平区人民法院", "industries": [ "汽车", "辅助驾驶", "刑事司法" ], "significance": { "legalNovelty": 28, "impactScope": 24, "institutionalLevel": 20, "crossBorder": 1, "sustainedCoverage": 13, "total": 86 }, "highProfile": true, "featured": true, "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-16", "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16", "proceedings": [ { "formalName": "郭某危险驾驶案", "identifier": "（2025）浙0113刑初596号 / 指导性案例271号", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2025）浙0113刑初596号" }, "forum": "杭州市临平区人民法院", "jurisdiction": "中国·浙江·杭州", "type": "criminal-litigation", "stage": "judgment", "status": "decided", "startedAt": "2025", "endedAt": "2025-09-19", "precedentialWeight": "persuasive", "officialUrl": "https://www.court.gov.cn/shenpan/xiangqing/489321.html", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:proceeding:criminal-first-instance", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271" } ], "events": [ { "date": "2025-09-19", "type": "judgment", "title": "法院认定 L2 辅助驾驶不改变实际驾驶人身份", "summary": "法院以危险驾驶罪判处郭某拘役一个月十五日，并处罚金 4,000 元。", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:proceeding:criminal-first-instance", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:effective" ] }, { "date": "2026-02-13", "type": "publication", "title": "最高人民法院发布指导性案例 271 号", "summary": "最高人民法院将郭某危险驾驶案作为指导性案例发布。", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:guiding-case-publication", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:proceeding:criminal-first-instance", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:guiding-status" ] } ], "documents": [ { "title": "指导性案例 271 号：郭某危险驾驶案", "originalTitle": "指导性案例271号 郭某危险驾驶案", "url": "https://www.court.gov.cn/shenpan/xiangqing/489321.html", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "china-courts", "publishedAt": "2026-02-13", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "locator": "指导性案例 271 号全文", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case", "familyId": "family-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-guiding-case", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:guiding-case-publication", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2025）浙0113刑初596号" }, "language": "zh-CN" } ], "claims": [ { "text": "法院查明，郭某饮酒后驾驶车辆，启动 L2 辅助驾驶、设置目的地并使用装置规避驾驶监测，随后离开驾驶位；血液酒精含量为 114.5mg/100ml。", "kind": "fact-finding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2025-09-19", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "text": "法院认定 L2 系驾驶辅助系统，不能替代驾驶人；郭某设定并启动行驶后仍是车辆实际驾驶人，规避监测和离座不改变其法律身份。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2025-09-19", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "text": "法院以危险驾驶罪判处郭某拘役一个月十五日，并处罚金人民币 4,000 元。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2025-09-19", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "text": "宣判后没有上诉、抗诉，判决已经发生法律效力。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2025-09-19", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:effective", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "text": "最高人民法院于 2026 年 2 月 13 日将本案发布为指导性案例 271 号。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2026-02-13", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:guiding-status", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:guiding-case-publication", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] } ], "caseBackground": { "narrativeZh": "郭某饮酒后驾驶配备 L2 辅助驾驶功能的车辆。他设定导航、启动辅助驾驶，并通过外接装置规避监测，离开驾驶位后车辆继续行驶并最终停在道路上。公安机关检测其血液酒精含量，检察机关以危险驾驶罪追诉。", "partiesZh": [ "公诉机关", "被告人：郭某" ], "aiSystemZh": "L2 级组合驾驶辅助系统", "challengedConductZh": "饮酒后启动辅助驾驶、规避驾驶员监测并离开驾驶位。", "allegedHarmZh": "造成道路交通公共安全风险，并试图以自动化控制规避驾驶人持续注意义务。", "proceduralOriginZh": "杭州市临平区人民法院一审判决生效，后由最高人民法院发布为指导性案例。", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence" ] }, "issues": [ { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "titleZh": "L2 运行时谁是法律上的驾驶人", "questionZh": "车辆由辅助系统控制转向和速度时，启动系统并离座的人是否仍在“驾驶”？", "contextZh": "L2 要求驾驶人持续监督并随时接管，不具备替代驾驶主体的能力。", "courtTreatmentZh": "法院认定郭某仍是实际驾驶人，规避监测和离座不能转移责任。", "topic": "professional-responsibility", "status": "resolved", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver:position:prosecution", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "sideZh": "公诉机关", "positionZh": "郭某设定目的地并启动系统，仍控制车辆运行目的和风险，应认定为驾驶。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver:position:defendant-context", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "sideZh": "被告行为所体现的抗辩背景", "positionZh": "离开驾驶位并让系统持续行驶并不能证明车辆处于无需驾驶人的自动驾驶状态。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] } ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "titleZh": "辅助驾驶是否减轻酒驾责任", "questionZh": "自动化程度能否否定危险驾驶的主观和客观要件？", "contextZh": "案件没有处理系统缺陷索赔，而是评价使用者主动规避监测的行为。", "courtTreatmentZh": "法院认为辅助驾驶不减轻驾驶人的安全注意义务，判处刑罚。", "topic": "product-liability", "status": "resolved", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility:position:court", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "sideZh": "法院", "positionZh": "L2 的技术辅助属性不能排除驾驶人的刑事责任。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility:position:unresolved-product-question", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "sideZh": "未决边界", "positionZh": "本案未判断若系统自身缺陷导致事故时制造商或软件提供者的责任。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ] } ] } ], "decisions": [ { "date": "2025-09-19", "outcomeZh": "郭某构成危险驾驶罪。", "holdingsZh": [ "L2 辅助驾驶不能替代驾驶人。", "启动系统、设置行驶任务并规避监测的人仍是实际驾驶人。" ], "reasoningZh": [ "L2 要求驾驶人持续监督并随时接管。", "主动安装装置规避监测并离开驾驶位，反而显示对安全义务的违反。" ], "reliefZh": "拘役一个月十五日，并处罚金人民币 4,000 元。", "scopeAndLimitsZh": "本案后被列为中国指导性案例；“指导性案例”按中国制度标注，不翻译为英美法意义上的 binding precedent，且结论限于 L2 与案内行为。", "precedentialWeight": "persuasive", "appealStatusZh": "无上诉、抗诉，判决已生效；2026 年 2 月发布为指导性案例 271 号。", "id": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:decision:criminal-judgment", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:proceeding:criminal-first-instance", "eventId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:document:guiding-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driving-facts", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:driver-status", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:criminal-sentence", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:effective", "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:claim:guiding-status" ] } ], "issueDocumentLinks": [ { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver-knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "documentId": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于分析采购者、专业人士和其他人类使用者在依赖 AI 辅助决定时的注意义务与可预见性。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver-knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "documentId": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "relationship": "technical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为能力陈述、测试边界、风险监测和组织问责提供通用技术治理框架；它不替代具体产品和案件证据。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "relationship": "technical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为能力陈述、测试边界、风险监测和组织问责提供通用技术治理框架；它不替代具体产品和案件证据。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于分析采购者、专业人士和其他人类使用者在依赖 AI 辅助决定时的注意义务与可预见性。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-news-context-products-liability-ai", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "news-context-products-liability-ai", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "代表把设计缺陷、警示义务和产品监管适配到 AI 系统的一种专业论证。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "supportive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" } ] }, "issueDocuments": [ { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver-knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "documentId": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于分析采购者、专业人士和其他人类使用者在依赖 AI 辅助决定时的注意义务与可预见性。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "familyId": "knowledge-family-negligence-ai-human-users", "title": "过失责任与 AI 的人类使用者", "originalTitle": "Negligence and AI’s Human Users", "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3350508", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "boston-university-law-review", "publishedAt": "2020", "author": "Andrew D. Selbst", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.3350508" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "把多数现实 AI 定位为人类决策辅助工具，分析不可预见错误、人机能力限制、软件脆弱性和统计偏差如何改变使用者的注意义务与可归责性。", "venue": "Boston University Law Review 100: 1315–1376", "publisher": "Boston University Law Review", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.2139/ssrn.3350508" }, "legalTopics": [ "product-liability", "professional-responsibility", "automated-decision-making", "consumer-protection" ], "aiRoles": [ "automated-decision", "judicial-professional-use", "model-output", "agentic-action" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver-knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:actual-driver", "documentId": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "relationship": "technical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为能力陈述、测试边界、风险监测和组织问责提供通用技术治理框架；它不替代具体产品和案件证据。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "familyId": "knowledge-family-nist-ai-rmf", "title": "人工智能风险管理框架 1.0", "originalTitle": "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)", "url": "https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "nist", "publishedAt": "2023-01-26", "author": "Elham Tabassi", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "以治理、映射、测量和管理四组功能组织 AI 风险控制，要求把能力陈述、测试边界、受影响群体、持续监测和问责责任落实到具体使用场景。它是风险管理框架，不直接决定个案法律责任。", "venue": "NIST AI 100-1", "publisher": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1" }, "legalTopics": [ "consumer-protection", "product-liability", "automated-decision-making", "professional-responsibility", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "automated-decision", "model-output", "agentic-action", "judicial-professional-use" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "relationship": "technical-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "为能力陈述、测试边界、风险监测和组织问责提供通用技术治理框架；它不替代具体产品和案件证据。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "descriptive", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-nist-ai-rmf", "familyId": "knowledge-family-nist-ai-rmf", "title": "人工智能风险管理框架 1.0", "originalTitle": "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)", "url": "https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "nist", "publishedAt": "2023-01-26", "author": "Elham Tabassi", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "以治理、映射、测量和管理四组功能组织 AI 风险控制，要求把能力陈述、测试边界、受影响群体、持续监测和问责责任落实到具体使用场景。它是风险管理框架，不直接决定个案法律责任。", "venue": "NIST AI 100-1", "publisher": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1" }, "legalTopics": [ "consumer-protection", "product-liability", "automated-decision-making", "professional-responsibility", "public-law-human-rights" ], "aiRoles": [ "automated-decision", "model-output", "agentic-action", "judicial-professional-use" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于分析采购者、专业人士和其他人类使用者在依赖 AI 辅助决定时的注意义务与可预见性。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 2 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.9, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-negligence-ai-human-users", "familyId": "knowledge-family-negligence-ai-human-users", "title": "过失责任与 AI 的人类使用者", "originalTitle": "Negligence and AI’s Human Users", "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3350508", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "boston-university-law-review", "publishedAt": "2020", "author": "Andrew D. Selbst", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.3350508" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "把多数现实 AI 定位为人类决策辅助工具，分析不可预见错误、人机能力限制、软件脆弱性和统计偏差如何改变使用者的注意义务与可归责性。", "venue": "Boston University Law Review 100: 1315–1376", "publisher": "Boston University Law Review", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.2139/ssrn.3350508" }, "legalTopics": [ "product-liability", "professional-responsibility", "automated-decision-making", "consumer-protection" ], "aiRoles": [ "automated-decision", "judicial-professional-use", "model-output", "agentic-action" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271-matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility-news-context-products-liability-ai", "matterId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271", "issueId": "matter-cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271:issue:automation-responsibility", "documentId": "news-context-products-liability-ai", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "代表把设计缺陷、警示义务和产品监管适配到 AI 系统的一种专业论证。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "supportive", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-products-liability-ai", "familyId": "news-family-products-liability-ai", "title": "人工智能的产品责任", "originalTitle": "Products Liability for Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/products-liability-for-artificial-intelligence", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-25", "author": "Catherine Sharkey", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章论证产品责任可通过设计缺陷、警示义务和高风险产品监管类比来约束 AI，同时正面处理软件是否属于产品以及用户行为介入的问题。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "评论主张产品责任能够激励开发者在发布前改善安全设计，但承认软件的无形性、因果关系和下游用户行为会使传统规则适配困难。", "legalTopics": [ "product-liability", "consumer-protection", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "model-output", "agentic-action", "automated-decision" ] } } ], "sources": [ { "id": "china-courts", "slug": "china-courts", "name": "Supreme People's Court of China", "homepage": "https://english.court.gov.cn/", "type": "court", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "boston-university-law-review", "slug": "boston-university-law-review", "name": "Boston University Law Review", "homepage": "https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "学生编辑法学评论，学校保存正式发表版本；SSRN DOI 仅作为稳定发现标识。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 24, "corrections": 16, "ownershipTransparency": 18, "expertise": 18, "historicalAccuracy": 12, "total": 88 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "nist", "slug": "nist", "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "homepage": "https://www.nist.gov/", "type": "government", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "rationale": "美国政府技术机构自有出版渠道，报告具有正式编号、作者、修订日期和 DOI。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "lawfare", "slug": "lawfare", "name": "Lawfare", "homepage": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/", "type": "newsroom", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "作者和编辑准则公开，长期提供国家安全、平台治理和科技法分析；具体案件结论仍回溯官方材料。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 23, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 19, "historicalAccuracy": 13, "total": 92 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16", "ingestion": { "feedEnabled": false, "feedUrl": null, "verification": "not-verified", "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links" } } ], "canonicalUrl": "/cases/cn-l2-assisted-driving-dui-guiding-case-271" }