{ "schemaVersion": "2.0", "generatedAt": "2026-07-16T12:09:49.394Z", "compatibility": { "legacyMatterFieldsRetained": true, "issueDocumentsAreNotTimelineEvents": true }, "matter": { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "slug": "cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "titleZh": "AI 生成声音人格权案", "formalName": "殷某某诉某文化传媒公司等声音权益侵权案", "aliases": [ "AI 声音侵权第一案", "（2023）京0491民初12142号", "Yin v. AI voice companies" ], "summary": "北京互联网法院认定，只要合成声音的音色、语调和发音风格足以使相关公众联想到特定自然人，声音权益即可延伸至 AI 合成版本；责任仍须按各公司授权链和主观过错分别判断。", "professionalSummary": "（2023）京0491民初12142号适用民法典关于声音参照肖像权保护的规则。法院认定三家公司构成侵害，但仅令存在过错的上游两家公司承担 25 万元赔偿；善意购买产品的下游公司不承担赔偿。", "whyItMatters": "该案把声音可识别性、训练或处理授权与分销链责任放在同一框架内，避免把所有使用合成声音的主体机械地等同处理。", "status": "decided", "primaryTopic": "personality-deepfake", "secondaryTopics": [ "privacy-data-protection", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "deepfake", "model-output" ], "jurisdiction": "中国·北京互联网法院", "industries": [ "配音", "语音合成", "软件服务" ], "significance": { "legalNovelty": 29, "impactScope": 23, "institutionalLevel": 16, "crossBorder": 6, "sustainedCoverage": 14, "total": 88 }, "highProfile": true, "featured": true, "firstPublishedAt": "2026-07-16", "lastUpdatedAt": "2026-07-16", "proceedings": [ { "formalName": "殷某某诉某文化传媒公司等声音权益侵权纠纷", "identifier": "（2023）京0491民初12142号", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2023）京0491民初12142号" }, "forum": "北京互联网法院", "jurisdiction": "中国·北京", "type": "civil-litigation", "stage": "judgment", "status": "decided", "startedAt": "2023-06-12", "endedAt": "2024-04-23", "precedentialWeight": "persuasive", "officialUrl": "https://english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn/2024-04/24/c_706.htm", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:proceeding:first-instance", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality" } ], "events": [ { "date": "2023-06-12", "type": "filed", "title": "殷某某提起声音权益侵权诉讼", "summary": "配音人员主张其录音未经授权被 AI 化并进入文字转语音产品链。", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:filed", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:proceeding:first-instance", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-hearing", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:filing", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain" ] }, { "date": "2024-04-23", "type": "judgment", "title": "法院认定 AI 合成声音侵害声音权益", "summary": "法院以可识别性确认声音权益，并按授权链与过错分配赔礼道歉和赔偿责任。", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:proceeding:first-instance", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:voice-relief" ] }, { "date": "2025-06-11", "type": "publication", "title": "最高人民法院发布人格权典型案例", "summary": "最高人民法院将本案列入利用网络、信息技术侵害人格权典型案例。", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:spc-typical-case", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:proceeding:first-instance", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:typical-publication" ] } ], "documents": [ { "title": "北京互联网法院公开审理 AI 生成声音人格权案", "originalTitle": "Beijing Internet Court hears AI-generated voice case", "url": "https://english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn/2023-12/13/c_676.htm", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "beijing-internet-court", "publishedAt": "2023-12-13", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-hearing", "familyId": "family-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-bic-hearing", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:filed", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2023）京0491民初12142号" }, "language": "en" }, { "title": "北京互联网法院 AI 生成声音案裁判发布", "originalTitle": "China's first AI-generated voice infringement case decided", "url": "https://english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn/2024-04/24/c_706.htm", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "beijing-internet-court", "publishedAt": "2024-04-24", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "familyId": "family-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-bic-judgment", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2023）京0491民初12142号" }, "language": "en" }, { "title": "殷某某诉某文化传媒公司等声音权益侵权纠纷入库案例", "originalTitle": "殷某某诉某文化传媒公司等声音权益侵权纠纷", "url": "https://sdcourt.gov.cn/dyzy/resource/cms/article/372898/35781100/2025031108461659757.pdf", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "peoples-court-case-library", "publishedAt": "2025-03-11", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "locator": "人民法院案例库 PDF 镜像", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "familyId": "family-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-case-library", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2023）京0491民初12142号" }, "language": "zh-CN" }, { "title": "利用网络、信息技术侵害人格权典型案例（案例二）", "originalTitle": "依法惩治人被“挂”、脸被“卖”——利用网络、信息技术侵害人格权典型案例", "url": "https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/467511.html", "kind": "official-document", "sourceId": "china-courts", "publishedAt": "2025-06-11", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "relationship": "independent", "locator": "案例二", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case", "familyId": "family-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-spc-typical-case", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:spc-typical-case", "identifiers": { "docketNumber": "（2023）京0491民初12142号" }, "language": "zh-CN" } ], "claims": [ { "text": "殷某某于 2023 年 6 月 12 日就未经授权的 AI 声音处理和使用提起诉讼。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2023-06-12", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:filing", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:filed", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-hearing", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library" ] }, { "text": "甲公司将殷某某录制的音频交给乙公司，乙公司将其 AI 化形成文字转语音产品，再由丙公司购买、包装并向用户提供；殷某某未授权这些 AI 化处理。", "kind": "fact-finding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2024-04-23", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:filed", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] }, { "text": "法院认定，若公众可从音色、语调和发音风格把 AI 合成声音与特定自然人联系起来，该声音具有可识别性并受声音权益保护。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2024-04-23", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] }, { "text": "法院认定三家公司未经许可的相关行为构成侵害，但丙公司以合理价格购买并合理信赖授权，不承担赔偿损失责任。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2024-04-23", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] }, { "text": "法院判令乙公司、丙公司赔礼道歉，甲公司、乙公司连带赔偿人民币 25 万元；相关产品已下架。", "kind": "legal-holding", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2024-04-23", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:voice-relief", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] }, { "text": "最高人民法院于 2025 年 6 月 11 日把本案列入利用网络、信息技术侵害人格权典型案例。", "kind": "procedural-fact", "status": "confirmed", "asOf": "2025-06-11", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:typical-publication", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:spc-typical-case", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] } ], "caseBackground": { "narrativeZh": "殷某某曾为甲公司录制音频。甲公司向乙公司提供音频，乙公司据此制作可将任意文字转换为殷某某声音的软件产品，再销售给丙公司。短视频平台出现使用该合成声音的配音后，殷某某起诉授权链上的三家公司。", "partiesZh": [ "原告：配音人员殷某某", "被告：音频持有方甲公司、语音产品开发方乙公司、下游软件运营方丙公司" ], "aiSystemZh": "以真人录音为素材的文字转语音合成产品", "challengedConductZh": "未经声音权利人许可对录音进行 AI 化处理、销售并向用户提供。", "allegedHarmZh": "声音人格利益被商业化复制、合成和传播，原告失去对声音身份使用的控制。", "proceduralOriginZh": "2023 年起诉，北京互联网法院于 2024 年 4 月作出一审判决，公开材料显示无人上诉。", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-hearing", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:filing", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability" ] }, "issues": [ { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "titleZh": "AI 合成声音的可识别性", "questionZh": "合成声音不是原始录音时，何种联系强度足以触发声音人格权益？", "contextZh": "民法典要求参照肖像权规则保护声音，但合成输出仍需与自然人可识别地关联。", "courtTreatmentZh": "法院以音色、语调、发音风格及相关公众的识别为判断因素。", "topic": "personality-deepfake", "status": "resolved", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability:position:plaintiff", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "sideZh": "原告", "positionZh": "合成声音仍能让听众识别为本人，应受人格权控制。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library" ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability:position:defendants", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "sideZh": "被告", "positionZh": "授权链中的录音使用许可及各自处理范围应分别评价。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment" ] } ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:scope-of-consent", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "titleZh": "录音许可是否覆盖 AI 化处理", "questionZh": "为传统录音制品提供音频，是否当然授权训练、合成和文字转语音商业化？", "contextZh": "取得录音文件不等于取得对声音人格利益的无限许可。", "courtTreatmentZh": "法院认定案内各公司没有取得 AI 化处理所需许可。", "topic": "privacy-data-protection", "status": "resolved", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:scope-of-consent:position:plaintiff", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:scope-of-consent", "sideZh": "原告", "positionZh": "录音合同没有授权制作可无限生成本人声音的新产品。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library" ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:scope-of-consent:position:court", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:scope-of-consent", "sideZh": "法院", "positionZh": "声音 AI 化是独立利用行为，应有明确授权。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] } ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:downstream-fault", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "titleZh": "下游购买者的过错与赔偿责任", "questionZh": "购买合成语音产品的下游运营者何时需要承担损害赔偿？", "contextZh": "侵害成立与赔偿过错是两个层次。", "courtTreatmentZh": "丙公司参与使用并需道歉，但因合理价格购买且对授权有合理信赖，不承担赔偿。", "topic": "platform-liability", "status": "resolved", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:voice-relief" ], "positions": [ { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:downstream-fault:position:plaintiff", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:downstream-fault", "sideZh": "原告", "positionZh": "授权链各公司共同使声音被广泛使用，应承担相应责任。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:authorization-chain" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ] }, { "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:downstream-fault:position:downstream", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:downstream-fault", "sideZh": "下游公司", "positionZh": "其通过正常交易购买产品，对上游有权提供存在合理信赖。", "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability" ], "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library" ] } ] } ], "decisions": [ { "date": "2024-04-23", "outcomeZh": "原告部分胜诉。", "holdingsZh": [ "具有可识别性的 AI 合成声音受自然人声音权益保护。", "录音持有或购买产品不当然取得 AI 化使用授权。", "赔偿责任须结合各被告主观过错分别判断。" ], "reasoningZh": [ "声音的音色、语调和发音风格可使公众产生与特定自然人的稳定联系。", "甲、乙公司未获合法授权；丙公司对授权存在合理信赖。" ], "reliefZh": "乙公司、丙公司赔礼道歉；甲公司、乙公司连带赔偿 25 万元；产品已下架。", "scopeAndLimitsZh": "普通一审民事判决，仅具说服性；并未确立所有相似合成声音都可识别，也未对无过错下游一概判赔。", "precedentialWeight": "persuasive", "appealStatusZh": "公开法院材料记载各方未上诉，判决已生效。", "id": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:decision:first-instance", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "proceedingId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:proceeding:first-instance", "eventId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:event:judgment", "documentIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:bic-judgment", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:case-library", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:document:spc-typical-case" ], "claimIds": [ "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:identifiability", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:liability", "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:claim:voice-relief" ] } ], "issueDocumentLinks": [ { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability-knowledge-deep-fakes", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "documentId": "knowledge-deep-fakes", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于区分深度伪造造成的人格、隐私、版权、证据和公共治理伤害及相应救济边界。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, { "id": "news-context-link-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" } ] }, "issueDocuments": [ { "link": { "id": "issue-document-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability-knowledge-deep-fakes", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "documentId": "knowledge-deep-fakes", "relationship": "doctrinal-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于区分深度伪造造成的人格、隐私、版权、证据和公共治理伤害及相应救济边界。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词；AI 作用分面只用于候选召回。", "viewpoint": "critical", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "knowledge-deep-fakes", "familyId": "knowledge-family-deep-fakes", "title": "深度伪造：隐私、民主与国家安全面临的挑战", "originalTitle": "Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security", "url": "https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J", "kind": "academic-research", "sourceId": "california-law-review", "publishedAt": "2019", "author": "Bobby Chesney; Danielle Keats Citron", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": { "doi": "10.15779/Z38RV0D15J" }, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "系统梳理深度伪造对人格、隐私、证据、民主和国家安全的不同伤害，并比较刑事、民事、平台治理和技术性应对各自的能力与代价。", "venue": "California Law Review 107(6): 1753–1820", "publisher": "California Law Review", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "stableIdentifier": { "kind": "doi", "value": "10.15779/Z38RV0D15J" }, "legalTopics": [ "personality-deepfake", "privacy-data-protection", "public-law-human-rights", "copyright" ], "aiRoles": [ "deepfake", "model-output" ] } }, { "link": { "id": "news-context-link-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality-matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability-news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "matterId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality", "issueId": "matter-cn-ai-generated-voice-personality:issue:voice-identifiability", "documentId": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "relationship": "news-context", "relevanceSummaryZh": "用于比较生成式 AI 供应链中训练复制、近似输出、元数据去除、商标和公开权的不同责任入口。 本次规则匹配仅使用本争点文本及其引用主张，命中 1 个确定性争点词。", "viewpoint": "mixed", "confidence": 0.8500000000000001, "assignedBy": "rule" }, "document": { "id": "news-context-ai-liability-ip-harms", "familyId": "news-family-ai-liability-ip-harms", "title": "AI 造成知识产权损害时，责任如何分配", "originalTitle": "AI Liability for Intellectual Property Harms", "url": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-liability-for-intellectual-property-harms", "kind": "professional-commentary", "sourceId": "lawfare", "publishedAt": "2024-09-23", "author": "Katrina Geddes", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "relationship": "independent", "identifiers": {}, "language": "en", "metadata": { "abstractZh": "文章分别分析未经许可训练、近似输出、版权管理信息、商标和形象商业利用，强调开发者、部署者与用户的责任不能用一个统一答案概括。", "venue": "Lawfare", "publisher": "Lawfare Institute", "publicationState": "published", "peerReviewed": false, "paywalled": false }, "editorialSummaryZh": "这篇评论把训练、输出和传播链条拆开，说明同一生成内容可能同时触发版权、商标与人格商业利用争议；它提供责任分配框架，不代表法院已经采纳其中结论。", "legalTopics": [ "copyright", "trademark", "personality-deepfake", "platform-liability" ], "aiRoles": [ "training-data", "model-output", "deepfake" ] } } ], "sources": [ { "id": "beijing-internet-court", "slug": "beijing-internet-court", "name": "Beijing Internet Court", "homepage": "https://english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn/", "type": "court", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "peoples-court-case-library", "slug": "peoples-court-case-library", "name": "People's Court Case Database", "nativeName": "人民法院案例库", "homepage": "https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/", "type": "legal-database", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 14, "total": 97 }, "rationale": "最高人民法院建设的案例库及其法院镜像 PDF 可核对案号、裁判要旨和裁判结果；普通入库案例仅作说服性材料展示。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "china-courts", "slug": "china-courts", "name": "Supreme People's Court of China", "homepage": "https://english.court.gov.cn/", "type": "court", "grade": "A", "primaryOrSecondary": "primary", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 20, "expertise": 20, "historicalAccuracy": 15, "total": 98 }, "rationale": "法院、政府或监管机构自有发布渠道；程序状态以其正式文书与登记信息为准。", "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-15" }, { "id": "california-law-review", "slug": "california-law-review", "name": "California Law Review", "homepage": "https://www.californialawreview.org/", "type": "academic", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "学生编辑法学评论，文章具有作者、卷期、页码和稳定 DOI；观点不作为案件事实。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 25, "corrections": 16, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 18, "historicalAccuracy": 12, "total": 90 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16" }, { "id": "lawfare", "slug": "lawfare", "name": "Lawfare", "homepage": "https://www.lawfaremedia.org/", "type": "newsroom", "primaryOrSecondary": "secondary", "rationale": "作者和编辑准则公开，长期提供国家安全、平台治理和科技法分析；具体案件结论仍回溯官方材料。", "grade": "A", "score": { "traceability": 23, "corrections": 18, "ownershipTransparency": 19, "expertise": 19, "historicalAccuracy": 13, "total": 92 }, "methodologyVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-07-16", "ingestion": { "feedEnabled": false, "feedUrl": null, "verification": "not-verified", "allowedUse": "discovery-metadata-and-deep-links" } } ], "canonicalUrl": "/cases/cn-ai-generated-voice-personality" }